POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super opt out plan a ‘tax grab’: ISA
The proposed Government plan to allow Australians to “opt out” of compulsory super by making the superannuation guarantee (SG) increase to 12% optional will be a “tax grab” on the average Australian family, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA).
The ISA said it would be a $20,000 tax grab on the average Australian family that could also leave them with up to $200,000 less super by the time they retire.
“Reneging on the legislated super guarantee increases would rip billions out of the pockets of workers to be funnelled into government coffers via higher taxes,” it said.
“Wages are taxed at a higher rate than super contributions leaving little for workers once the tax office takes its cut.
“ISA analysis shows that up to two-thirds of an increase could be lost in higher taxes and reductions in other government support payments.”
It said figures from the Government’s own Retirement Income Review showed such a plan would leave all income groups worse off - with lower lifetime disposable incomes.
“It would also be an administrative nightmare to manage an opt-out system – wrapping small business in yet another layer of red tape,” it said.
“This underhanded plan to make super optional would force workers to pay themselves a wage increase by sacrificing their retirement savings – leaving the average 30-year-old couple up to $200,000 less at retirement.
“Any Budget boost would be short-lived, as the super savings grab would lead to a far higher pension bill for future generations.
“The government MPs advocating for this proposal, who all gleefully pocket more than 15% super, are determined to make Australians sacrifice their retirement savings for the government’s Budget – all while they give up nothing.”
Matthew Linden, ISA deputy chief executive, said making the SG “optional” was a recipe for higher taxes, lower lifetime incomes, and a red tape nightmare for business.
“The Government should follow through on the legislated increase to 12% and not be exploring underhanded ways to renege on it,” Linden said.
“This isn’t choice – it’s a sneaky tax grab that will leave people worse off and rip up one of the system’s founding principles.”
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
What do people who do not have a vested interest say? Asking Industry (union) super if more money should go to super is like asking my puppy if he should get more food.
And a query re the $200k - if the 30 year old puts money into a home loan instead of super, pays their home of earlier, and can then start increasing super contributions earlier how does that affect the calculation. My belief is the calculation assumes if people take the money as wages then it s wasted. So fake news.
Maybe ISA could help by not spending money advertising the SG increases and instead give higher investment returns.