Superannuation has been the primary driver for growth in the superannuation industry, according to new research released by Roy Morgan.
The research, covering the 17 years since the first Financial Systems Review conducted by Stan Wallis, has pointed to the manner in which Australia’s superannuation guarantee regime has driven growth alongside lending.
The Roy Morgan research, released today, reveals that since the first FSR in 1997, the Australian consumer financial services market has grown at 10 times the rate of the population and that the principal drivers for that growth have been superannuation and lending.
“Superannuation and lending have been the principal drivers of growth, with super now the major financial category, equivalent to just under half the total market value of financial services while lending grew by 324 per cent,” the Roy Morgan analysis said.
It said the over-50s were an increasingly dominant force, comprising 39.5 per cent of the population and 55.9 per cent of the financial services market.
As well, the analysis confirmed that the top 20 per cent wealthiest customers dominated the market, controlling 64.8 per cent of its overall value, while the bottom 40 per cent accounted for just 2 per cent.
The research also appeared to emphasise the impact of vertical integration, suggesting the big four banks had increased their market strength, despite the 1997 inquiry predicting that new entrants and shifting market dynamics would result in more competitive conditions.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.