POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super system fee structure driving SMSF growth
The superannuation industry's fee structure is hitting members hard and causing them to move from retail and industry funds to self-managed super funds (SMSFs), according to LJ Financial private client adviser Duncan Brown.
He said the funds under management (FUM) fee structure, which operates as a percentage-based fee based on a member's account balance, was old-fashioned and did not incentivise performance.
"It is a bit of an old-fashioned system, and a lot of people have a problem with it — when the global financial crisis hit and the markets were tumbling, individuals were still getting charged fund management fees on top of their losses."
He said most funds hit members with administration and management fees as well, and as a result of all of the fees many members could get a better return from a term deposit.
It was no surprise that so many members were switching across to the self-managed sector, he said.
The misalignment of interests between fund managers and members was another factor driving the shift to the self-managed sector, Brown said, because retail and fund managers had a short time horizon while investors invested for the long-term.
"Unfortunately, retail and industry fund managers have the target to produce profit in the short term, whereas members are in it for the long-term growth, meaning the investment strategy is not aligned," he says.
Brown said herding was still a problem and led fund managers to believe all they needed to do was out-perform the average to continue to be paid their bonuses and pay rises, even if they had lost members' money.
"The fund can still be classed as a market leader, despite passing over negative returns, as its returns were above the market average," he said.
Brown said the first problem with the superannuation system was that funds under management were too large at $1.4 trillion — which meant legislation had to cater to the masses.
"This might not suit what an individual might be trying to achieve from their super, due to the lack of investment flexibility," he said.
Poorly structured retail funds that did not cater to the individual's financial goals limited growth opportunities and further drove investors towards SMSFs, according to Brown.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
Governor Bullock took a more hawkish stance on Tuesday, raising concerns over Trump’s escalating tariffs, which sent economists in different directions with their predictions.
Equity Trustees has announced the appointment of Jocelyn Furlan to the Superannuation Limited (ETSL) and HTFS Nominees Pty Ltd (HTFS) boards, which have oversight of one of the companies’ fastest growing trustee services.
Following growing criticism of the superannuation industry’s influence on capital markets and its increasing exposure to private assets, as well as regulators’ concerns about potential risks to financial stability, ASFA has released new research pushing back on these narratives.
A US-based infrastructure specialist has welcomed the $93 billion fund as a cornerstone investor.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
33.51 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
32.68 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.62 3 y p.a(%)
4
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
31.36 3 y p.a(%)
5
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
29.60 3 y p.a(%)
