POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Super system fee structure driving SMSF growth
The superannuation industry's fee structure is hitting members hard and causing them to move from retail and industry funds to self-managed super funds (SMSFs), according to LJ Financial private client adviser Duncan Brown.
He said the funds under management (FUM) fee structure, which operates as a percentage-based fee based on a member's account balance, was old-fashioned and did not incentivise performance.
"It is a bit of an old-fashioned system, and a lot of people have a problem with it — when the global financial crisis hit and the markets were tumbling, individuals were still getting charged fund management fees on top of their losses."
He said most funds hit members with administration and management fees as well, and as a result of all of the fees many members could get a better return from a term deposit.
It was no surprise that so many members were switching across to the self-managed sector, he said.
The misalignment of interests between fund managers and members was another factor driving the shift to the self-managed sector, Brown said, because retail and fund managers had a short time horizon while investors invested for the long-term.
"Unfortunately, retail and industry fund managers have the target to produce profit in the short term, whereas members are in it for the long-term growth, meaning the investment strategy is not aligned," he says.
Brown said herding was still a problem and led fund managers to believe all they needed to do was out-perform the average to continue to be paid their bonuses and pay rises, even if they had lost members' money.
"The fund can still be classed as a market leader, despite passing over negative returns, as its returns were above the market average," he said.
Brown said the first problem with the superannuation system was that funds under management were too large at $1.4 trillion — which meant legislation had to cater to the masses.
"This might not suit what an individual might be trying to achieve from their super, due to the lack of investment flexibility," he said.
Poorly structured retail funds that did not cater to the individual's financial goals limited growth opportunities and further drove investors towards SMSFs, according to Brown.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
