Superannuation fund trustees could be hit by a $4,200 penalty as the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) focuses on auditing investment strategies, the SMSF Alliance warns.
The ATO has requested over 17,000 funds provide evidence their investment strategy meets the retirement objectives and cashflow requirements of the fund, especially those with 90% of more of its funds invested in a single asset class.
SMSF Alliance principal and SMSF specialist mentor, David Busoli, said this would give auditors a reason to pay more attention to the investment strategies of all other funds as well.
“The ATO seem to be prepared to overlook breaches where funds have already been audited as the letter specifically states ‘Have your investment strategy ready to provide to your SMSF's approved auditor as part of your next audit’,” he said.
Busoli warned that if the auditor identified the fund had failed to rectify any non-compliance with the requirements it could result in a penalty.
However, Busoli has previously said that diversification had to be “considered” but did not mean it must be “achieved”.
“If it has been properly considered, and its absence justified, the rules are satisfied,” he said.
“The problem with some investment strategies is that they are little more than a regurgitation of the requirements, a statement that they have been considered and an asset allocation that is meaningless, such as 0% to 100% in any asset.”
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.