Superannuation engagement is in the eye of the beholder

6 March 2012
| By Tim Stewart |
image
image
expand image

The definition of an 'engaged' superannuation member should differ for each fund, depending on its overall objectives, according to eo Financial Services.

The Super System Review panel defined an 'engaged member' as someone who makes an investment choice - that is, a member who is outside the fund's default option.

But eo Financial Services general manager for marketing Dzu Huynh argues that just because a member is in the default option doesn't mean they aren't engaged.

"Rather than defining members by this one action, each fund needs to set its own parameters of what engagement looks like, based on the member profile and [the fund's] broader business objectives," said Huynh.

For example, one fund may choose to define an engaged member as someone who chooses to consolidate their super, said Huynh - while for another fund, someone who is salary sacrificing into their super may be defined as engaged.

For some funds, it may simply be enough that a member keeps their contact details up-to-date, he said.

Most importantly, funds need to be realistic about their engagement goals, with the aim being "to get members to do just one more thing - not seven", said Huynh.

"It's difficult for members to jump from being completely disengaged to making high-level choices such as getting financial advice or completing binding death benefit nominations," said Huynh.

In the MySuper environment, when funds' resources will be scarce, it will be crucial to segment members and target the "high value" members who are most open to responding to engagement drives, he added.

"This will also ensure that the members being targeted are those most likely to help the fund achieve its objectives and members receive what they expect," said Huynh.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 5 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 5 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 6 hours ago