Superannuation trustees have revised their policies after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found a lack of oversight and control measures in relation to investment switching.
ASIC reported its surveillance of 23 trustees in October, finding significant deficiencies in their conflicts management arrangements relating to investment switching.
“ASIC expected to find robust systems in place to prevent directors and senior executives from potentially misusing price sensitive information for personal gain. However, the surveillance revealed a lack of strong oversight in this space.”
In response to the corporate regulator’s concerns, trustees committed to implement a range of changes including:
ASIC commissioner, Danielle Press, said, “Appropriate governance is integral to maintaining consumer trust and confidence in the superannuation industry. This is not something you can set and forget.
“Trustees must have conflict management arrangements in place that are continually reviewed and tested to ensure they remain appropriate.”
ASIC also completed its review of a range of transactions during the 2020 calendar year by directors, senior executives or their related parties.
This involved the switching of investment settings, changes to investment contribution allocations and superannuation contributions, and the withdrawal and roll in of superannuation monies.
Based on the evidence obtained during its surveillance, ASIC said it was satisfied no further action was warranted against any individuals in relation to the identified transactions.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.