Superannuation trustees revise investment switching policies

7 April 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation trustees have revised their policies after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found a lack of oversight and control measures in relation to investment switching.

ASIC reported its surveillance of 23 trustees in October, finding significant deficiencies in their conflicts management arrangements relating to investment switching.

“ASIC expected to find robust systems in place to prevent directors and senior executives from potentially misusing price sensitive information for personal gain. However, the surveillance revealed a lack of strong oversight in this space.”

In response to the corporate regulator’s concerns, trustees committed to implement a range of changes including:

  • Updating or establishing policies and practices to address the deficiencies ASIC highlighted by:
    • identifying switching as a potential conflict of interest;
    • incorporating steps to prevent inappropriate trading (such introducing blackout periods or trading windows);
    • expanding conflicts arrangements to cover trading by related parties of directors and senior executives;
  • Increasing board-level engagement so there was greater board oversight, input and direction. For instance, increased monitoring of staff transactions and reporting back to the board, including on switching activity;
  • Increasing staff awareness of the policies and their obligations through greater internal communication and training; and
  • Undertaking an independent review of the trustee’s broader conflicts management frameworks.

ASIC commissioner, Danielle Press, said, “Appropriate governance is integral to maintaining consumer trust and confidence in the superannuation industry. This is not something you can set and forget.

“Trustees must have conflict management arrangements in place that are continually reviewed and tested to ensure they remain appropriate.”

ASIC also completed its review of a range of transactions during the 2020 calendar year by directors, senior executives or their related parties.

This involved the switching of investment settings, changes to investment contribution allocations and superannuation contributions, and the withdrawal and roll in of superannuation monies.

Based on the evidence obtained during its surveillance, ASIC said it was satisfied no further action was warranted against any individuals in relation to the identified transactions.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

10 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

10 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

10 months 2 weeks ago

The profit-to-member super funds are officially operating as a merged entity, set to serve over half a million members. ...

1 day 17 hours ago

Super Review announced 21 winners at the annual Super Fund of the Year Awards, including the recipient of the prestigious Fund of the Year Award....

2 days 8 hours ago

APRA data shows the CFMEU accounted for 28 per cent of super fund industrial contributions, with the shadow treasurer calling for a prompt investigation into the payments...

3 days 12 hours ago