Independent or expert directors are not crucial to company or trustee boards and conflicts of interest are not critical if they are declared to all other members of a board, according to Investec Bank chairman David Gonski.
Addressing the opening plenary of the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) on the Gold Coast, Gonski advocated diversity on boards, particularly with respect to the inclusion of women.
Speaking at a time when the major industry funds are facing Federal Government moves to change governance arrangements within super funds, Gonski suggested that it would be wrong to assume that appointing “expert” directors would necessarily be a step in the right direction, while precluding those with perceived conflicts of interest might prove counter-productive.
“I am persuaded that independence can be a state of mind,” he said. “I have seen many directors who might have been perceived to be conflicted because of share holdings or other involvements but who, in practice, have adopted an independent and highly valuable approach,” he said.
Gonski said he believed perceived conflicts of interest were easy to handle when everyone knew about them.
“The greater danger is secrecy,” he said. “I don’t fear conflicts of interest as much as I fear ignorance of such,” he said.
Gonski also cautioned against appointing experts to boards, such as IT professionals, unless they could look broadly and beyond their single area of expertise.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.