Trustees need help with ATSI death benefit payments

4 June 2019
| By Hannah |
image
image
expand image

Some super funds have admitted that awareness levels of indigenous kinship structures in the superannuation industry aren’t as developed as they could be, although measures such as mechanisms to help trustees identify members as indigenous could help improve this.

In a submission to the Treasury’s discussion paper on superannuation bunding death benefit nominations and kinship structures, members of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) also called for better communication with indigenous members around super death benefits and improved awareness within the industry of the kinship structures of within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) communities. They felt this could help trustees better distribute benefits according to kinship relationships.

Introducing more consistent protocols to assist indigenous people with proving their identity and family relationships would further assist, as would the establishment of processes to enable the member, or others, to alert trustees that family violence meant the death benefit shouldn’t be paid.

The submission also called for regulators and legislators to play a greater role in improving the flexibility and knowledge trustees had when considering kinship relationships.

“This could be achieved through consultative and appropriate guidance and support from regulators (APRA in particular) for trustees and other decision-making bodies (such as AFCA) to address the existing challenges in distributing superannuation benefits created by differing interpretations of the legal requirements,” the submission said.

“This could include guidance from APRA as to the interpretation and application of definitions of dependant, kinship structures, financial dependence and interdependency.”

Additionally, the Government could prescribe common terminology to words such as ‘family’ that impact death benefit determinations to make them more in-line with indigenous kinship structures, and extend the decision frameworks used by Government agencies such as Centrelink when determining family payments to the public.

On the topic of Centrelink, members contributing to the submission also suggested that trustees were given access to relevant information about payments and claims held by the Australian Taxation Office and Centrelink when an ATSI fund member passed away.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

19 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

19 hours 41 minutes ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

20 hours 39 minutes ago