The average amount of time taken to pay members eligible for the early access to superannuation scheme has plateaued at 3.3 days over the last three weeks, according to Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) data.
APRA said since the scheme’s inception on 20 April to 24 May, payments had taken an average of 3.3 business days to pay after receipt of the application from the Australian Tax Office (ATO) and 94% had been made within five business days.
Another 1.4% had been paid within 10 or more business days.
“The 10 funds with the highest number of applications received from the ATO have made 1.09 million payments worth a total of $8.13 billion. The average payment from these funds was $7,595, with over 93% of payments made within five days,” APRA said.
Looking at the funds that had paid the largest amount to members, the funds that were the fastest to pay were Public Sector Superannuation Accumulation Plan, Meat Industry Employees Superannuation Fund, Sunsuper Superannuation Fund, Tasplan Superannuation Fund, and AON Master Trust.
The fastest-paying funds that have paid the most in the early access to super scheme
Fund |
Payments made |
Applications paid within five business days |
Public Sector Superannuation Accumulation Plan |
$34,696,773 |
100% |
Meat Industry Employees Superannuation Fund |
$22,144,496 |
100% |
Sunsuper Superannuation Fund |
$1,249,900,735 |
99.9% |
Tasplan Superannuation fund |
$75,282,086 |
99.9% |
AON Master Trust |
$27,604,940 |
99.9% |
Source: APRA
Since April, $12.2 billion has been paid to members.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.