When a nomination isn’t valid

13 June 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds need to be careful in ensuring that non-lapsing nominations (NLN) signed by their members are actually valid and consistent with the relevant legislation.

That is the bottom line of a recent determination handed down by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) (D16-17\149) which saw the decision of a superannuation fund to strictly follow a deceased member’s NLN set aside and the death benefit, plus interest directed to the deceased’s son.

The SCT decided to set aside the NLN because it entailed a sister living in another country who could not be proved to have an interdependent relationship.

What is more, the superannuation fund was told that it had to pay the son irrespective of any benefit it had already paid to the deceased member’s sister.

The SCT determination held that the superannuation fund trustee could not reply upon the NLN because the sister did not actually fulfil the requirements of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act with respect to being interdependent.

It found that because the sister and the deceased lived in different countries and therefore did not “live together” meant that a key section of the Act 10A (1)(b) was unable to be fulfilled.

The SCT determination said that in the absence of having checked the validity of the NLN, it was “unfair and unreasonable of the trustee to accept it held a NLN in favour of the sister”.

“Instead, it should have dealt with the benefit as if it did not hold a NLN and paid the benefit to the legal personal representative (LPR) of the deceased,” the determination said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 18 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 18 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 19 hours ago