POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Working with third parties could ensure funds suit all members
It is crucial for super funds to recognise that their members have different needs and different risk appetite and they should have a strategy in place for those who do not fit their product range, which might include working with the third parties.
Speaking at the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) conference, Mercer’s senior partner, David Knox, pondered whether, in the absence of the adequate products, funds should advise their clients to look for products elsewhere and send those clients to the third party.
“What a fund needs to do is have a strategy to say what we are doing for these who do not fit the products that we offer. There is no reason why a fund cannot work with a third party, whether it is a life insurer or whether some other form of organisation, maybe someone with the pool of the longevity products,” he said.
“I don’t think the fund has to have full suite of products but they need to recognise there is a heterogeneity of members with different needs, different desires and different risk appetites.”
Knox stressed that some members would want a very high growth, riskier approach, while others would be on the other end of the spectrum, and even when a fund does not offer a full range of such products, and all needs should be taken into account.
“Of course, the problem with that is that most funds do not want to pass assets on somebody else or members on somebody else. But there will be some cases when this will be appropriate,” he added.
According to Geoff Warren, an associate professor at the Australian National University (ANU), one of the biggest challenges that super funds faced when developing their retirement strategies was the heterogeneity of the members.
“This raises the question that if you are dealing with a lot of different dimensions [of clients] what member information you would need to cohort and tailor [the strategies] effectively,” he said.
The other thing funds needed to have was a mechanism which would design the joint investment strategy and a drawdown strategy.
“The retirement strategy is essentially two components: there is an investment strategy and the drawdown strategy that will be actually working in tandem,” he said.
In order to build such a strategy, the funds would need to decide which investment building blocks they want to use. This might be some combination of growth asset portfolio, defensive asset, longevity insurance or annuities, among others.
“And I am a big fan of thinking about it as combing various building blocks rather than developing products, so dividing building products and drawdown strategy to arrive at an overall retirement strategy.”
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
