Super funds lag on pay equity strategies or plans

26 April 2016
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation funds are not doing much when to creating a pay equity strategy or action plan after conducting a pay gap analysis, according to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA).

While 53.9 per cent of the super industry is female, only 33.3 per cent of funds have a specific gender pay gap equity objective included in formal policy or strategy.

The WGEA also found that only 10 per cent of employers created a pay equity strategy or action play following a remuneration gap analysis.

After conducting a remuneration gap analysis half of super funds said they identified cause/s of the gaps, 20 per cent reviewed the remuneration decision making process, 20 per cent analysed performance pay to ensure there was no gender bias (including unconscious bias), 40 per cent analysed performance ratings to ensure there was no gender bias, and 20 per cent analysed performance pay to ensure there was no gender bias.

Only 10 per cent trained people-managers in addressing gender bias (including unconscious bias), 50 per cent corrected like-for-like gaps, and while 60 per cent reported pay metrics to an executive, only 20 per cent reported to the board.

However, remuneration gap analyses are on the rise with 56.3 per cent of employers conducting one within the last 12 months, compared to zero per cent between two to four years ago.

The gender pay gap was the highest when it came to key management personnel at 21.7 per cent, followed by other executives/general managers (20.5 per cent), other managers (20.1 per cent), and senior managers (14 per cent).

The WGEA data found only 5.9 per cent of chief executives were female, 30.9 per cent were key management personnel, and 32.2 were other executives/general managers. Senior managers and other managers was where the gap seemed to be closing at 40.9 per cent and 42.6 per cent respectively.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Kevin Williamson on Tue, 04/26/2016 - 13:30

Perhaps the "bias" can start to be overcome with "Women In Super" circulating job vacancy advertisements to all employees at a Fund, not just the females. That way the male employees, who they push to help with projects such as Mothers Day Classic, won't continue to suffer discrimination.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 17 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 17 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 18 hours ago