The superannuation sector is going through a golden era of fund mergers. But negotiating and executing a superannuation fund merger is challenging, exciting, stressful and rewarding.
It calls for a laser-like focus on the benefits to fund members, careful negotiation with stakeholders and a keen eye for detail to ensure that members’ interests are not only protected but enhanced.
Once the merger is completed and the party poppers have been binned the real work starts. As the old adage goes, the proof of the pudding is in the eating – or in the case of mergers, in the execution.
If the merger is between a large and a small fund, often the ways of working, systems and processes of the larger fund are adopted. This is not unexpected nor wrong but there may be a better approach.
Things are more complicated when a merger is between funds of about equal size, sophistication and complexity – a mergers of equals.
In these mergers, trustees must make decisions about every component of the value chain to decide which elements will be adopted, discarded or changed to ensure that the merged fund is more than simply the sum of the parts of the previous funds.
This requires working through key questions including: Which administration, risk and compliance systems should prevail? Which processes best support the new fund? Which people are needed to take the merged fund into the future? What will the product and service suite look like? What is the strategy and vision for the future? All must be considered carefully and meticulously worked through.
The objective of any merger of superannuation funds should not simply be to scale up for scale’s sake, or to be a vessel to sum the funds under management and number of members. This is the 1 + 1 = 2 outcome. Scale matters, but only if it helps you play the ball forward and will deliver a better outcome than the two merging funds could achieve singularly.
The business case supporting a merger of superannuation funds is often couched in terms of tangible and intangible benefits that will flow to members. Trustees will rightly seek assurance and evidence that benefits will accrue, such as enhanced members’ retirement outcomes, reduced costs (in real terms and relative to a non-merger scenario), enhanced future services and product development, and expanded investment opportunities.
So if the will, the skill, and the intent is in place, shouldn’t it be relatively straightforward to achieve the benefits set out in the business case?
The answer is it is neither simple nor easy. Transforming a business while continuing business as usual adds to the difficulty.
So how can we ensure a merger is successful? In my view, the top five factors that can have a big influence in merger success are:
These top five are not a point-in-time undertaking nor a project. They transcend individual, technical pieces of work and instead, and relate to a way of doing things – every day of every week.
Michael Pennisi is a Brisbane-based Principal at Nous Group. He was previously the CEO of the QSuper Group.
High risk, high return assets will become dangerous options for superannuation funds under the Federal Government’s planned $3 million superannuation changes, writes Brad Twentyman.
Economic policy can no longer ignore the macroeconomic impacts of Australia's superannuation system and the emerging policy implications, writes Tim Toohey.
In an age where climate concerns and social consciousness dominate headlines, it’s no surprise that investors are increasingly seeking investments that align with their values, writes Simon O’Connor.
How profit-for-member superannuation funds can embed 'commerciality with a heart' and marry a member-first culture with commercial outcomes.